THE ERROR OF MAULANA FADHLUR RAHMAAN
HONOURING AND CONDONING THE NNB JAMIAT’S FUSSAAQ AND DEVILS RENDERS THE ARSH OF ALLAH TA’ALA SHUDDERING
On the issue of Maulana Fadhlur Rahman (who teaches Hadith) gracing the haraam ‘bukhaari’ jalsah of the fussaaq, munaafiq NNB jamiat scoundrels, an Aalim comments as follows:
Assalaamualaikum
- Is it not misleading and incorrect for the Sheikhul Hadeeth of Azaadville to be doing the Bukhari Khatam for the Fordsburg Jamiat?
- If someone asks me my view on this issue and on Moulana Fadhulr Rahamaan doing the Bukhari completion for the NNb jamiat, what should I say? (Say that the venerable Maulana Saheb has grievously erred – The Majlis)
- Some people have argued:
“The intention of Moulana Fadhlur Rahmaan of Azaadville is to go and use the platform. Just like how these Ahle Baatil are taking our platforms and using our mimbars to infiltrate, so Moulana Fadhlur Rahmaan holds a position like when we get an opportunity to speak the Haq on their platforms such as their Jalsahs and their Musjids, then we must use the platform to put the Haq forward and point out the flaws in whatever capacity. Moulana Fadhlur Rahmaan does not endorse it with his presence, but to use it as a platform for stating the Haq.”
(This argument is absolutely drivel. He is devoid of Shar’i substance. It is a ploy of Iblees and a trick of the nafs. The Maulana is in reality supporting the baatil of the Ibleesi cartel with his presence. – The Majlis)
With all due respect to whoever deserves it, I must say that according to my limited understanding these arguments in defence of Moulana Fadhlur Rahman Azmi are absolutely rubbish in my opinion and the presence of Sheikhul Hadeeth Moulana Fadhlur Rahman of Azaadville, is satanic to say the least.
Please do advise if any of my comments and unwanted remarks are incorrect.
(Your comments are valid. In fact, it was our intention to publish an obligatory comment for this Maulana Sahib, however, you have lightened our task. – The Majlis)
Just look at the poster! He will be sharing a platform with Fussaaq such as this Qari Ayub Essack and this Shaytaan Sajjad Nomani. Now what Nahi Anil Munkar is Moulana Fadhlur Rahmaan Azmi going to make to them when the attitude and manhaj of Moulana Fadhlur Rahman show and prove that Moulana Fadhlur Rahmaan Azmi believes that by his attendance Amr Bil Maroof, Nahi Anil Munkar is automatically done?
It seems to me as if these Tableeghis including Moulana Fadhlur Rahmaan are worried of increasing the numbers of the Tabligh Jamaat. They are more concerned about more ‘Tabligh’, (i.e. their specific methodology – The Majlis) but are very lazy and slack when it comes to defending the Deen. Yes, they will go all out in defending the Mastooraat-Makshufaat fitnah, but what about all the Baatil in which the Ummah is drowning?
I also don’t understand how the Ahle Baatil are taking the platforms of the Haq?
(This stupid idea is drivel to bolster their nonsensical argument. – The Majlis)
Furthermore, Moulana Fadhlur Rahman Azmi is publicly silent on a range of issues which deserve a public voice of explicit Nahi Anil Munkar. So, who is Moulana Fadhlur Rahmaan Azmi fooling with this type of an attitude that we must grab hold of the platforms of the Ahle Baatil? (In fact, they get lost and become assimilated into the web of baatil. – The Majlis) Is there no other platform to state the Haq? For what must we use the platforms of the Ahle Baatil? And what Haq does he intend stating at the Jalsah of the Munaafiqeen? (At the NNB’s jalsah, he will not be practising any Amr Bil Ma’roof Nahy Anil Munkar. On the contrary, he will be purring praise for the Ahl-e-Baatil’s confounded, haraam ‘madrasah’ which has made the Qur’aan and Hadith the handmaid of kuffaar education. – The Majlis)
Will he say Tv is Haraam and condemn such Ulama as Fussaaq?
Will he say that photos are Haraam?
Will he condemn all the be-pardagi?
Will he condemn universities and schools?
Will he declare the Shias as Kaafir?
Will he condemn so-called Islamic banking?
Will he condemn the Kufr of running to court to close the Musaajid???
(No! He cannot be expected to uphold the Flag of the Deen. Never will he condemn these issues in which the entire community is flagrantly indulging. – The Majlis)
Is the Sheikhul Hadeeth prepared to state this Haq for the sake of the Deen? And how will he say this at a Jalsah of the enemies of the Deen when we don’t even hear this publicized from his own jalsahs? (Regretfully, the Maulana Sahib dwells in a sea of self-deception with his ludicrous idea of ‘hikmat’. – The Majlis)
How can one intentionally do the Bukhari Khatam of the Munaafiqeen? Will he do the same for the Barelvis? (It is not farfetched to expect that he may do so. – The Majlis)
Moulana Fazlur Rahmaan is in grave error. He is too naive to understand that the Jamiat rubbishes are using him for their benefit. (No, he cannot be so naïve. There is always a sinister nafsaani agenda to this type of vile participation as useless functions. – The Majlis)
On the other hand, the idea of him using the platform of the Ahle Baatil for propagating the Haq is ludicrous and totally laughable.
Moulana Fazlur Rahmaan is being used to attract crowds. Our Fatwa is that people should not attend the Jalsahs of this Fordsburg Jamiat, but the Sheikhul Hadeeth of Azaadville who is one of the main members of Wifaaqul Ulama, is going to be present at the Jalsah of people who are trying to change the Shariah!!! His presence at the Jamiat Jalsah is misleading and he knows deep down his heart the amount of name and fame that goes with this Jalsah.
Furthermore, Moulana Fadhlur Rahmaan’s idea of using the platform of the Ahle Baatil for stating the Haq is not only a red herring and a deception from Shaytaan, but it is extremely insincere. (It is insincere because he will not be stating anything of the Haqq which the NNB is practising. – The Majlis) Several years ago when Moulana Fadhlur Rahmaan wrote some points against the Jamiat, his article of Haq was not supposed to be made public. Moulana Fadhlur Rahmaan was not happy that his letter to the Jamiat was made public. Now, why so??? As an Aalim of the Haq, the Baatil of jusa has to be publicly refuted. But, when the Majlis published a translation of Moulana Fazlur Rahmaans article more than a decade ago, then the Sheikhul Hadeeth was uncomfortable.
The problem with the Moulana Fadhlur Rahmaan Azmi and also Mufti Motara is that they believe that Munaafiqeen, Murtads and Ulama-e-Soo should not be refuted explicitly with the names of the culprits nor should these nnb characters be exposed publicly. This is their manhaj of Kitmaanul Haq, Dumb Shaytaaniyyat and sweeping facts under the carpet.
I don’t know what ‘Haq’ is Moulana Fadhlur Rahmaan going to state at the Jamiat’s Jalsah when he has failed to publicly speak against these Jamiat chaps. We hardly hear anything from the Sheikhul Hadeeth regarding the Mudhilleen. The Jamiat chaps want to change the Shariah, but the Sheikhul Hadeeth feels comfortable amongst these enemies of Islaam. Their lamentable excuses for the Sheikhul Hadeeth are weak and putrid to say the least. (In fact, utterly baseless—The Majlis)
They went to court to close the Musaajid and the Sheikhul Hadeeth is going to be doing their Bukhari Khatam which is worse than normal participation. If this Sheikhul Hadeeth was a genuine Aalim of the Haq, he would have told them straight on their faces, “No!”, and he could have used the opportunity to dissuade and turn people away from the NNB devils. But, in this manner the Sheikhul Hadeeth is encouraging people and bringing people closer to the Mudhilleen. And this is horribly misleading. For a Sheikhul Hadeeth to do the Bukhari Khatam, gives the impression that people may study under this foul Jamiat which makes a mockery of the Qur’aan and Hadith at its baatil ‘madrasah’. Does the Sheikhul Hadeeth not know that one has to be a matriculant to study under these nnb Munaafiqs? This Sheikhul Hadeeth is fast asleep. (And also lost in his baseless ideology of compromising with rascals and scoundrels who are digging up the foundations of the Deen. – The Majlis)
It is obvious that the Sheikhul Hadeeth will be shaking hands and hugging all the Munaafiqs and fussaaq. How does he feel about that and deliberately allowing himself to be in such a situation. He is increasing their crowd and for how long will this Sheikhul Hadeeth be concealing his true colours? Whilst the Sheikhul Hadeeth does not agree to the evils of the Jamiat, he feels comfortable being on the stage at Nurul Islam, a stage used by all sorts of Munaafiqs to mislead and misguide the masses. A Sheikhul Hadeeth, who claims to be from the Ulama-e-Haq, on the stage of the munaafiqeen!!! (A stupid paradox which fool only these maggots of baatil. – The Majlis)
No ways! This is what I call betraying the Deen. By his participation, he is throwing water over all his Nahi Anil Munkar, even though his Nahi Anil munkar is in any case a watered-down version of what it supposed to be.
Why would the uucsa-jusa Munaafiqs give their Bukhari Jalsah platform to an Aalim from Wifaaqul Ulama? It just does not make sense. (At least it portrays the cunning of bogus molvis and the density of mind of the others. – The Majlis) Who is deceiving who here? Are the Wifaaq Molvis not different from the jusa uucsa characters? But a Wifaaq Sheikhul Hadeeth at the Jalsah of confirmed fussaaq and people who want to change the Shariah on so many issues. Is the Sheikhul Hadeeth not aware of their latest kufr antics termed as Fiqhul Aqalliyyaat?
People speak of benefits, but the harm according to my understanding is worse here! Will the Sheikhul Hadeeth attend a Moulood only for the bayaan??? For the sake of the benefits of changing the mindset of a couple of Barelwis and the Qabar pujaaris! Why will he not use the Barelwi platform? (He may still venture into that cesspool of villainy in the footsteps of Tariq Jameel. – The Majlis) These nnb chaps are not Deobandi. They are on TV! They don’t make Hijaab. But, the Sheikhul Hadeeth is in fact promoting these Fussaaq even though he and his followers will claim the opposite.
Their arguments in defence of the Sheikhul Hadeeth are insipid and downright stupid. Do they treat the Kufr MMB Bill so lightly that they are willing to participate in the merrymaking riya jalsahs of those who went to court with lesbians and people who hate the Shariah!! Are they not aware of Mufti Rasheed Ahmed Gangohi’s Fatwa regarding people who find fault with the Shariah? A fatwa which is 100% applicable to the uucsa-jusa characters.
How does an Aalim of the Haqq feel comfortable amongst the Mudhilleen? (Let us call a spade a spade. In reality he is not an Aalim of Haqq. – The Majlis) And being the main person in their Jalsah? Subhaan-Allah! Or rather I should say Astaghfirullah!
And lastly, the fact that the Jamiat is allowing or they have invited the Sheikhul Hadeeth for their Bukhari completion merely proves the gullibility of the Sheikhul Hadeeth and possibly gives an indication of the Sheikhul Hadeeth being from the Ulama-e-Soo?
This is very sad or else I have completely misunderstood the whole situation. I do accept that my comments are harsh and will be construed as be-adabi. (You have not misunderstood the situation nor are your comments harsh. Stating the Haqq is not ‘harshness’. Yes, the concealers of the Haqq are harsh in their baatil. – The Majlis)
23 Rabiuth Thaani 1444 – 18 November 2022