It is mentioned in the Hadith that Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had once instructed some Sahaabah to observe I'tikaaf together with him.

Answer

When a person is a slave of his nafs, he becomes blind to the Shariah. Then he peddles whatever junk comes to his nafs, distorting Ahaadith and Aayaat as 'proof' for his bid'ah and satanism. There is absolutely not the slightest vestige of permissibility for mass I'tikaaf in any Hadith. Mass I'tikaaf never was a practice of the Sahaabah or in the era of Khairul Quroon. In fact, mass i'tikaaf has only recently developed, and bogus 'sheikhs' have taken it to new levels of bid'ah.

Firstly, the juhala have no right to dig out Hadith narrations for formulating masaa-il. The function of structuring masaa-il from the Qur'aan and Ahaadith is the exclusive domain of the Aimmah-e- Mujtahideen. The Muqallideen have to confine themselves to the Shariat as it has come down to us from the Sahaabah and the illustrious Aimmah of the Deen.

Secondly, although Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had observed I'tikaaf every year, he had never organized any mass I'tikaaf. The solitary occasion when he had instructed the Sahaabah to observe I'tikaaf, is not a reference to mass I'tikaaf. The instruction applied to those Sahaabah who had been in I'tikaaf during the first ten days and the second ten days of the Month of Ramadhaan was when there was no indication regarding Lailatul Qadr, hence in order to obtain the Night, they passed the entire month in I'tikaaf.

However, when it was revealed to Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) that Lailatul Qadr was one of the last ten nights, he ordered those Sahaabah who had been in I'tikaaf during the first 20 days, to observe I'tikaaf during the last ten days to ensure that they do gain the good fortune of Lailatul Qadr. The Hadith mentioned in Bukhaari and Muslim states:

"Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) observed I'tikaaf during the first ten nights of Ramadhaan, then the middle ten nights. He (Nabi - Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: 'Verily I observed I'tikaaf during the first ten nights searching for this Night. Then I observed I'tikaaf during the middle ten nights. It was then said (revealed) to me that it (Lailatul Qadr) is during the last ten nights. Therefore whoever had been in I'tikaaf with me should observe I'tikaaf during the last ten nights......."

Explaining this Hadith, At-Teebi said: "Verily, he ordered I'tikaaf for those who had been with him during the first and middle ten nights so that their effort (searching for Lailatul Qadr) does not go to waste.....(Mirqaat)

It was not a merrymaking, wasteful, bid'ah mass circus event consisting of much khuraafaat (drivel) as we have explained in our booklet and articles on this topic. It is contumacious and satanic to compare the current mass 'i'tikaaf' merrymaking gatherings with the I'tikaaf which Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had ordered for a few Sahaabah for the specific objective of enabling them to obtain Lailatul Qadr in one of the last ten nights, a fact which was unknown prior to their observing I'tikaaf during the first 20 nights.

Further, the instruction was not general. It was specifically for the few Sahaabah who had been in I'tikaaf during the first 20 nights. Then of greater significance is the fact that the Sahaabah never understood this instruction to be an order for observing mass I'tikaaf. None of the Sahaabah had ever organized mass I'tikaaf as the fake 'sheikhs' of our era do. The worst feature of these mass i'tikaafs is the circus environment and circus atmosphere consisting of the many evil acts which have been explained in our booklet and article. There is absolutely no 'daleel' in the aforementioned Hadith for the mass 'i'tikaaf' stunts of this day. And remember that the khaanqah practice of any Buzroog is not a daleel for elevating such practice to the status of Sunnah. Generally, the unrestrained observance of practices initiated by well-known Buzroogs, later develop into hardcore bid'ah. Moron khalifas and mureeds utilize such practices in pursuit of their nafsaani objectives.

BRAINLESS and wealth are in Jannat.

Worldly wealth is for con- "The world is a home for structing and adorning him who has no home.

one's Home in Jannat. The It is wealth for him who purpose of wealth is not has no wealth, and the hoarding and squandering one who has no aql on earth. Rasulullah (brains) accumulates

( S a l l a l l a h u a l a y h i (wealth)

wasallam) said: "Your for the sake of the wealth is only that which world." (Hadith)

you have sent ahead (for The Mu'mins true home your stay in Jannat)."

Shocking new study shows chemo kills half of cancer patients, not cancer itself

Tuesday, September

20, 2016 by: Amy

Goodrich

Tags: chemotherapy, ca ncer treatment, patient fatalities

(NaturalNews) A new landmark study found that up to 50 percent of people who receive chemotherapy are killed by the treatment, not cancer itself. For the first time, researchers from Public Health England and Cancer Research U.K. examined the numbers of cancer patients who died within 30 days of starting chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy is an invasive and toxic treatment to kill cancer cells. Unfortunately, chemo doesn't differentiate between a cancerous or a healthy cell. As a result, it kills all living matter on its way. Furthermore, chemo drugs are known to damage the immune system. This makes cancer patients more vulnerable to infections, which may contribute to the high mortality rates.

Chemo kills within the first 30 days

The study, which was published inThe Lancet Oncology medical journal, looked at more than 23,000 women with breast cancer and nearly 10,000 men with lung cancer who underwent chemotherapy in 2014. Of those treated with chemotherapy, 1,383 died within 30 days.

As reported by the Telegraph, on average 8.4 percent of lung cancer patients and 2.4 percent of breast cancer patients died within a month. That number, however, depended hugely on the hospital.

The mortality rate at Lancashire Teaching Hospitals for those undergoing palliative chemotherapy for lung cancer, for instance, was 28 percent. But in Milton Keynes the death rate for lungcancer treatment went up to 50.9 percent.

According to Dr. Jem Rashbass, Cancer Lead for Public Health England, chemotherapy is a crucial part of cancer treatment. He, however, admitted that chemotherapy drugs are potent chemical substances with significant side effects.

He further noted that getting the balance right to aggressively treat patients can be hard. Therefore, hospitals with death rates outside the expected range have had the findings shared with them. Also, they have been asked to review their practice and data.

Doctors should be more careful about pushing toxic treatment

Furthermore, the authors of the study have advised physicians to exercise more caution in selecting which patients should receive chemotherapy. They noted that some people, such as older and more infirm patients, might be better off without it.

"I think it's important to make patients aware that there are potentially life threatening downsides to chemotherapy. And doctors should be more careful about who they treat with chemotherapy," said Professor David Dodwell, Institute of Oncology, St James Hospital, Leeds, UK.

Effective alternative treatments do exist, but due to bad governmental policies in favor of the Big Pharma, cancer patients in most areas of the U.S. are withheld from such treatments and are forced into expensive chemotherapy treatments or face time in jail.

Remember the 17-yearold girl who was diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma? Last year, after seeking out alternative care, she was denied contact with her own family and placed in foster care while health authorities forced her to undergo cancer treatment against her will.