It is mentioned in the Qur‟aan that Allah Ta‟ala said to Hadhrat Zakariyya (Alayhis salaam) the sign for his barren (infertile) aged wife of 90 years

Answer

Firstly, Kalaam Azad was a deviate. He was a Hindu bootlicker. He was the servant of Ghandi who dictated to him. He followed Ghandi, not the Qur‟aan. The stupid interpretation of this deviate is in diametric conflict with the interpretation of the Sahaabah and the Salafus Saaliheen. It is in denial of the clear meaning of the Aayat. His stupid interpretation is baatil. Basically, he was a jaahil with corrupt beliefs. Discard his drivel.

THE SURFACE AND

THE BOWELS OF THE EARTH

Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: "When your rulers are the noblest among you; your wealthy are the most generous among you and your affairs are decided by mutual consultation, then the surface of the earth is better for you than its bowels (the grave). (But) when your rulers are the worst among you, your wealthy the most niggardly among you, and your affairs are entrusted to your womenfolk, then the bowels of the earth (the grave) will be better for you than the surface of the earth." That is, death will be better than living on earth. This Hadith aptly fits the present

time.

Wishing and yearning for Maut (death) due to worldly difficulties are not permissible. However, Auliya are generally overwhelmed by the Love of Allah Ta‟ala, hence they yearn for Maut to be in proximity with Him. Also, for valid reasons of the Deen such yearning is permissible.

During a plague, Hadhrat Aabis Ghaffaari (Radhiyallahu anhu) would make dua for Maut and repeatedly would he exclaim: "O Plague (i.e. the Rabb of the Plague)! Take me!" His cousin said: "O Aabis! How can you make such a dua when you are aware that Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had said: „No one of you should yearn for Maut, for verily it severs all (good) deeds."

Hadhrat Aabis (Radhiyallahu anhu) said: "Yes, I have heard it, but I fear six things which I had heard from Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and which he feared for his Ummah: (1) The reign of unfit persons (who will become rulers, kings and government officials). (2) Abundance of police (3) Illegal trade (4) Severing family ties (5) Killing will be regarded with insignificance (6) Such people who will make a song of the Qur‟aan (i.e. such as today‟s fussaaq qaaris), and those lacking in Deeni understanding will be ushered to the front."

Hadhrat Abu Bakr Siddique (Radhiyallahu anhu) was asked to explain his yearning for Maut. He responded: "I fear to be in an age in which Amr Bil Ma‟roof Nahyi Anil Munkar will be abandoned."

Hadhrat Abu Ubaidah Jarraah (Radhiyallahu anhu) and Hadhrat Muaaz Bin Jabal (Radhiyallahu anhu), both very senior and top-ranking Sahaabah made dua for Maut in the Plague of Amwaas. They described the Plague as a Rahmat and a Shahaadat and yearned to die by the Plague. Their supplication was accepted and both gained Shahaadat in the Plague of Amwaas. They did not perish like dogs in filthy hospitals with filthy kuffaar staff administering filthy haraam medical treatment in torturous circumstances of conspicuous kufr.

THE AGE OF SENILITY

"Among you are those whom We return to the age of senility." (Qur‟aan)

Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) sought refuge with Allah Ta‟ala from the senility of old-age. Hadhrat Sa‟d (Radhiyallahu anhu) narrated in this regard that Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) would make dua as follows:

"O Allah! Verily I seek Your protection from niggardliness, and I seek Your protection from cowardice, and I seek Your protection from being returned to the age of senility, and I seek Your protection from the fitnah of this world and the punishment of the Grave."

Abundant Tilaawat of the Qur‟aan Majeed together with abstention from sin and futility prevent the condition of senility overtaking one in old-age.

Is fatwa below on fatwa website correct? My wife wanted to know.

DELAYING MENSTRUA- TION BY INJECTION

Is it permissible for a Woman to have an injection for the purpose of delaying menstruation to enable her go through ibadah like Hajj or Umrah?

Answer

In principle, a woman should not tamper with and alter the natural state of her body as created by Allāh Ta‟ala. Generally, a woman would know her monthly cycle and may then make use of calculations to determine a suitable date to perform Umrah.

The use of such injections would, however, be permitted under unavoidable circumstances such as in the case of Hajj wherein a woman would be unable to perform the obligatory Tawāf (al- Ziyārah) before her departure date from Makkah.

This is also provided that it is done under the medical guidance of one‟s doctor and is not proven harmful to the body.

Answer

The fatwa is moronic. In the first place it does not answer the question. The question is about permissibility of perpetrating the satanic unnatural act of taking medication to prevent haidh for the purpose of going to perform Hajj and even Nafl Umrah.

The questioner does not ask about specifically Tawaaf Ziyaarat. Since this mufti is in bewilderment and off the track in shoving his own implied question into the Istifta‟, he relates the question to Tawaaf Ziyaarat to produce his idea of "unavoidable circumstances".

He says that the satanism is permissible "under unavoidable circumstances". What is so "unavoidable" about not going for Hajj and Umrah? Today, even Fardh Hajj should be delayed due to the vaccination and other acts of shaitaaniyat. Then the mufti speaks more drivel by saying: "This is also provided that it is done under the medical guidance of one‟s doctor and is not proven harmful to the body."

Shaitaan has really convoluted the brains and thinking of the muftis of today. Firstly 99.9% of doctors today are faasiq and even atheists. Their advice is satanic rubbish. The logical conclusion of this drivel is that if the satanic medication is harmful for the body then it will not be permissible. If so, then what happens to her Tawaaf-e-Ziyaarat? In the understanding of this mufti chap, omitting Tawaaf-e-Ziyaarat should qualify the woman for the satanic medication because it does constitute "unavoidable circumstances", regardless of what her doctor says and regardless of it being harmful to her body. This mufti should answer this question. It is not for us at this juncture to present the answer. We merely point out the contradiction and drivel of his fatwa.

Let it be known and understood well that whatever method / medication is adopted to interfere with the natural process created by Allah Ta‟ala is always harmful. It is by the intervention of Iblees. What the fussaaqatheists doctors say is trash to be compulsorily discarded.

It is haraam for a woman to go for Hajj and even worse for Umrah if she has to resort to haraam.